Skip navigation.

Blog

Did Congress worsen the banking crisis?
by Jonathan Morduch

Researchers and financial analysts are still sorting through causes of the financial crisis. One target is the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), which requires that banks to lend to low and moderate income people in the communities where they take deposits. Among the naysayers are Ron Paul, who charged the CRA with "forcing banks to lend to people who normally would be rejected as bad credit risks.", and Jeffrey A. Miron, an economics professor at Harvard, who called for “getting rid” of policies like the CRA that “pressure banks into subprime lending.” But Paul and Miron may now have to eat their words.

 

An exhaustive new study by 12 Federal Reserve Banks absolves the CRA in the sub-prime crisis. Here’s Randall Kroszner:

“Two key points emerge from all of our analysis of the available data. First, only a small portion of subprime mortgage originations are related to the CRA. Second, CRA- related loans appear to perform comparably to other types of subprime loans. Taken together, as I stated earlier, we believe that the available evidence runs counter to the contention that the CRA contributed in any substantive way to the current mortgage crisis.”(Emphasis ours.)

Themes: Big Picture
Bookmark and Share

Why not look hard at the issues of accounting principles?

The crisis that I describe as the bursting of the bubble modern America ... and the clones around the world ... is founded in part on an absolutely abysmal system of score-keeping where old fashioned accounting principles are totally ignored in favor of convenient rules and conventions that make a nonsense of the metrics.

Banks have made very little profit from banking for maybe 30 years ... much of the profit is from transaction fees and consultancy ... not from investing money and serving customers and community. Fees are not associated with their costs ... which often stretch out many years.

How has the accounting profession allowed so much off balance sheet liability to exist? There should be an accounting for lobbyists and law makers that allowed these practices to be legal. This is not about regulators ... the referees, if you will ... it is about the people that make the rules of the game.

And where are the academic leaders in all of this? There are huge issues in the basic failure of score-keeping ... and nobody has any idea of how much has gone wrong. This is appalling!

Peter Burgess